Stakeholder Landscape Mapper

Stakeholder Landscape Mapper

Know where they stand. Know what they need. Know what to do next.

The problem

Six weeks into a global SAP S/4HANA rollout across 14 countries. Three executive sponsors. Two works councils with legal consultation rights. Two stakeholders who are nodding in steering meetings while quietly working against the program.

This is exactly the kind of high-stakes, time-pressured scenario that Stakeholder Landscape Mapper was built for. Not a generic prompt. A specialist tool with the methodology, the frameworks, and the professional judgment encoded into every output.

What makes this different

ADKAR® Phase Diagnosis

Maps every stakeholder group to their current ADKAR® phase, not where you want them to be, but where they actually are. Engagement strategies target the real gap.

The Engagement Matrix™

20 distinct engagement strategies generated from the intersection of power, interest, and ADKAR® phase. No generic 'keep informed' placeholders.

Sponsor Alignment Diagnostics

Identifies whether your sponsors are actively showing up or just lending their name. Flags misalignment before it becomes a project risk.

Shadow Narrative Diagnosis

Surfaces the undercurrent running through each stakeholder group so your engagement plan addresses what people are actually thinking.

See it in action

Global ERP Implementation

Six weeks into a global SAP S/4HANA rollout across 14 countries. Three executive sponsors. Two works councils with legal consultation rights. Two stakeholders who are nodding in steering meetings while quietly working against the program.

Example prompt

Map the full stakeholder landscape for our workforce optimisation review. 1,200 employees across 4 offices. Here are the key groups: (1) Senior Leadership Team (12 people), (2) Middle Managers (45 people), (3) Operations staff (400 people), (4) Corporate Functions (80 people), (5) Customer-facing teams (300 people). The organization went through redundancies 18 months ago that were handled poorly. Run the full assessment.

KEEP SATISFIEDMANAGE CLOSELYMONITORKEEP INFORMEDINTEREST →INFLUENCE →Low interestHigh interestHigh influenceLow influenceGroup CFOCommitted sponsorManage closelyAPAC Fin. DirectorsHidden blockerSkeptical, shadow ExcelCPOSilent resisterDisengaged since scopingSupply Chain DirsConditional supporterWatching Phase 1Finance Ops TeamsWorks council legal riskGermany + BrazilIT & Systems TeamBurnout riskDual system loadCommittedConditional / at-riskHidden blocker / legal riskDashed = hidden resistance

What standard Claude produces

Group assessments

Senior Leadership Team, 12 people

Your most urgent problem. Two sponsors performing alignment in meetings while actively undermining the program outside them is a governance failure. The rest of the SLT is watching what happens to them. Name the behavior directly in private conversation, offer a genuine off-ramp, and give it two weeks. If nothing changes, escalate formally; their continued dual role is a program-level risk.

Middle Managers, 45 people.

The most underestimated group. They translate every executive message into what 700+ people actually believe. Many survived the last redundancy round and are now pattern-matching for who's next. Flight risk is real and silent. Brief this group before all-staff, with more candor. Identify 5-7 informal leaders within the cohort and engage them separately.

Operations Staff, 400 people.

Hardest hit by the prior round, longest institutional memory. Expect deep distrust of formal channels and heavy reliance on informal networks. Don't let all-staff communications be their primary channel; they'll discount it. Design listening sessions, not briefings. Acknowledge the prior redundancy handling explicitly before they raise it.

Corporate Functions, 80 people.

Watchful rather than resistant. The risk is passive blockage, slow sign-offs and quiet non-participation framed as capacity constraints. HR is under particular pressure, acting simultaneously as change agents, process owners, and personally affected employees.

Customer-Facing Teams, 300 people.

Internal uncertainty travels directly into customer interactions. If this group disengages, service quality degrades visibly and measurably. Treat silence as withdrawal, not acceptance. Monitor service metrics as your leading indicator of engagement health.

What's running beneath the surface.

The 18-month shadow. This workforce remembers who found out informally, which managers protected their people, and what promises weren't kept. Any communication pattern that echoes those failures will be decoded as confirmation history is repeating. Name the prior handling explicitly, and name what will be different this time.

The works councils. Two councils with legal consultation rights are a governance asset most programs under-use. Engage chairs before any broader communication. If they're onside, they become credibility assets. If they feel bypassed, they have the mandate and mechanism to slow or block.

The informal network. Six weeks in, speculation is already filling the vacuum. Around 8-15 people across your organization shape what others believe, rarely the most senior. Map them, brief them early with more candor than the all-staff message, and they'll carry that credibility into conversations you'll never be in.

Sequencing: non-negotiable.

Works councils → SLT → Middle managers → All staff.

Anyone who learns from an all-staff message before their manager has briefed them has already lost trust in the process. The sequence is the message.

Standard engagement advice. Nothing about what the APAC Directors are actually protecting, or that Germany's works council can legally stop your go-live.

What Stakeholder Landscape Mapper produces

Hidden Blocker: APAC Regional Finance Directors.

Surface behavior: Attending steering meetings. Asking polite questions. Nodding.

Underneath: Both have maintained sophisticated Excel reporting ecosystems for over a decade. SAP removes their operational autonomy and exposes the fact that their regional data has never fully aligned with corporate standards. They have more to lose from a clean implementation than from a delayed one.

Risk vector: They will not block publicly; they will slow-walk data migration decisions, raise localisation concerns, and build the case for APAC-specific configuration that extends the timeline.

Hidden Blocker: Chief Procurement Officer.

Surface behavior: Minimal engagement. Delegating everything.

Underneath: The CPO lost a trusted direct report during project scoping. The CPO views the program as having taken something from procurement before delivering anything in return.

Risk vector: Without active CPO sponsorship, Procurement will comply in form and resist in practice.

Legal Risk: Works Councils Germany and Brazil.

Germany's Betriebsrat has the legal authority to delay system deployment if consultation is not completed. A go-live injunction would affect 180 Finance Ops users, 29% of Phase 1 volume. This is not a change management action. It is a legal obligation. Action required in Week 1.

Visual Grid created. Hidden blockers profiled. What they are protecting, not just that they are resistant. Legal risk flagged before it becomes a go-live injunction. 13-page report and action recommendations.

Notice how the Quiet Risk Detector catches what a standard grid misses: customer-facing teams score low on formal power, which typically means low engagement priority. But silence in a high-impact change isn't adoption; it's withdrawal. When 300 people who talk to customers all day haven't asked a single question about a system that changes how they do their jobs, that's not a quiet group. That's a quiet risk.

Want to see the full output? Download your free Claude skill →

The difference specialist methodology makes

Same scenario. Same prompt context. Different results.

Standard Claude
Stakeholder Landscape Mapper
Stakeholder identification
Surface-level org chart mapping. Named groups in quadrants.
Power-Interest Grid with ADKAR® Phase Diagnosis. Hidden blockers surfaced beneath the surface behavior.
Resistance detection
Flags obvious resistors. 'High resistance noted.'
Profiles what they are protecting, not just that they are resistant. Behavior beneath the behavior.
Legal and compliance risk
Not identified.
Works council obligations in Germany and Brazil flagged as Week 1 legal actions, not CM actions.
Engagement tactics
Generic ‘increase communication’ guidance.
Named tactic per blocker, named owner, named sponsor action, specific week.
Inaction consequences
Not modelled.
Specific business impact of each unaddressed risk: including cost, timeline, and go-live injunction risk.

Get Stakeholder Landscape Mapper

Individual Skill

$495

one-time

Get the Skill
BEST VALUE

Full Library

$895/year

All 10 skills. All updates.

Get the Library

All sales are final. We encourage you to try the free Change Communication Audit before purchasing so you can evaluate the quality firsthand.

What you get

Everything you need to deploy this skill inside your own Claude account today. No subscriptions. No platform lock-in. Yours to keep.

One-time purchase

$495

Single-user license. Use in your own Claude account.

Get the Skill →
  • The Skill File, optimized for Claude, ready to deploy in minutes
  • Quick-Start Prompt Guide, pre-built prompts for common stakeholder scenarios
  • Engagement Matrix Reference Card
  • Downloadable .docx report generation
  • 80+ languages. Zero extra cost.

Who it’s for

Built for practitioners who do the work, not observers who talk about it.

1

Change manager

Complete stakeholder landscape in minutes instead of days.

2

Program manager

Evidence-based stakeholder strategy for steering committee presentations.

3

External consultant

Consistent methodology that scales across client engagements.

Global Ready

80+ languages.
Zero extra cost.

80+

Languages

100%

Cultural context

$0

Extra cost

This skill works in over 80 languages out of the box. Prompt in English, get output in Japanese. Prompt in Portuguese, get output in Arabic.

Cultural context is maintained, not just word translation. The skill adjusts its frameworks, its tone, and its output for the culture you’re working in, not just the language.

No add-ons. No language packs. It just works.